Q. What are the core differences between WiFi and LoRaWAN®?
A. Beth: WiFi emerged in the late 1990s and represents the connection of wireless routers to nearby devices that exchange data via radio waves, enabling internet connectivity and high-speed transmissions of large amounts of data. LoRaWAN, on the other hand, was purpose-built for IoT and was officially launched in 2015. As the name implies (Long Range Wide Area Network), it transmits small amounts of data over long-distance ranges – connecting battery-operated devices (“things”) to the internet and operating using low power – crucial for longer battery life. LoRaWAN can penetrate thick materials – like concrete walls, metal surfaces, and dense basement areas – making it ideal for use cases like smart buildings, which are of high value for hospitality campus networks. As a result, the technology benefits manifest “behind the scenes,” relating to the operational side, where it can be leveraged to mitigate operational risk and alleviate expenses – as in the case of sensor-enabled leak detection, humidity, energy, air quality, asset tracking, and occupancy monitoring – all of which are valid use cases in the hospitality industry.
Matthew: Most organizations already have broadband which is ideal for transmitting large amounts of data over short distances with low latency. WiFi can support critical services, real-time applications, and remote monitoring. Since the availability and ubiquity of WiFi are so robust, it can be leveraged to rapidly onboard general-purpose sensors in hotels. At the same time, LoRaWAN provides coverage spanning long distances in remote and heavily occupied locations. This is where we see the “friendship” between WiFi and LoRaWAN since they work together as friends – LoRaWAN for massive IoT deployments and sensor-enabled tracking devices, and WiFi to power onboarding and internet connectivity for data aggregation and visualization.